17
their viewa to you, but I did not fully concur in them. Ar Bre-in was the senior officer who had any aptitude for the post. He was an officer of great merit and ability who would very keenly feel being rassed over by a man of half his service, and his excellent work entitled him to recognition. If his physique was equal to the work (which I doubted) he had strong claims. They had, I understood, opposed his appointment on the ground that he was too"pro- Chinese", ae Registrar General I pointed out that it was officially his duty to take the Chinese point
of view, but I believed him to be a mix who if he
held a more responsible gwaitinx and larger office
would take correspondingly large views, and in this
opinion Sir leury day who had known him for 20 years
concurred. As regards är Clementi I endorsed all
they had said, de dombinod great ability with exception
al industry and rapidity, and had as Assistant Colonial
Lecretary a long training in and knowledge of the
Looretariat work, as regards ir Sercombe Smith I
informed them that the Chinese lumbers of Council
had told me that if he were appointed they would find
it necessary to resign their aesta on the Council as
they had found hin an impossible man to work with.
i dight personally prevail upon them not to take this
step,
but if they insisted it would be most difficult
to replace them, and what they had said was an indica-
tion of the depth of feeling against the appointment
which was held by the Chinese. Sir Paul Chator had
at first associated himself with them in recommending
Er Brovin.
3
After very careful consideration
I had decided to recommend the appointment of A
Brewin
Z
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.